Today boundary disputes are becoming more and more commonplace. When a fence is broken or conifers are left to grow too high, neighbours want to know whose responsibility they are. Therefore, establishing the boundary of a property is important because it will determine the extent of the land over which rights and liabilities may attach. The legal boundary is the invisible line that divides the land between the ownership of adjoining land owners. Contrary to popular belief, often physical boundaries do not always follow the same line as the legal boundary.
When property is registered at the Land Registry (which most property in the UK is) the boundary line is usually a ‘general boundary’ which is not the exact line of the legal boundary. Therefore, registration with a general boundary does not determine ownership and importantly, the maintenance obligations of physical boundary features.
When disputes between neighbours arise, and the parties want to establish the legal boundary the first place to look may be the old pre-Land Registry title deeds. The property description clause in an old conveyance or transfer may describe the property precisely enough to determine the legal boundary and may make reference to a plan. Inverted ‘T’s’ marked on plans are now accepted as persuasive evidence of ownership of a boundary feature.
Often title deeds are unavailable or unclear; therefore several legal presumptions have emerged and are applied by the courts when trying to resolve disputes;
1. Hedge and Ditch;
When properties are separated by a hedge and an adjoining single ditch there is a presumption that the land owner on the hedge side owns both the hedge and the ditch.
2. Roads;
Where a property adjoins a road, and the road falls outside the red edging on the title plan, the owner is presumed to own up to the middle of that road. Where the road is classed as a public highway this presumption is subject to various rights of the Highways Authority.
3. Non-tidal rivers and streams;
The owner of a property that abuts a natural non-tidal river or stream also owns the bed of the river up to the centre line and if the course of the river or stream changes naturally, the boundary is presumed to change with it.
4. Sea-shore;
Where a property adjoins the sea, there is a presumption that the boundary of the property extends to the top of the foreshore, this is the land that lies between the high and low water marks of an ordinary tide.
5. Fences;
It is a common belief that the posts of a fence are on the owner’s side. This is not a legal presumption; however, the position of the posts may be taken into account by a court in helping to determine the ownership of the fence.
Legal boundaries can also be established by an application to the Land Registry. The application must be accompanied by sufficient evidence in support of the boundary line claimed. A notice will then be served on the adjoining neighbours and if any of them object to the application the dispute may need to be resolved by the court. This is an expensive and time consuming route to take.
Finally, boundary disputes can be resolved by agreement between the parties. There are two types of boundary agreement; first those that constitute an exchange of land and second, those where the parties merely intend to determine an unclear boundary. There is a presumption that an informal boundary agreement falls into the latter category. It is perhaps a little ironic that, though this is the cheapest and simplest way to resolve disputes, the likelihood of such an agreement in the context of a dispute is very slim indeed.
To find out more about property boundaries and how you can resolve any disputes, please contact Zoe Colling on 01723 352125 at Scarborough, Helen Jackson on 01262 673445 at Bridlington Noel Barrett on 01947 601122 for Whitby.
The above is for general information only, please contact us for further information